Judicial Review
Federal Court Appeal
Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA) judicial review of ART decisions. Explains the difference between merits review and judicial review, grounds for appeal, the process, and what outcomes are possible.
What Is the FCFCOA?
The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA) — Division 2 — is the primary court for judicial review of ART immigration decisions. If the ART has refused your visa appeal, or if the ART’s decision contained a legal error, you may be able to apply to the Federal Circuit Court to have the ART’s decision reviewed by a judge.
Judicial review is fundamentally different from merits review at the ART. The Federal Court does not examine whether the ART reached the right decision on the facts — it asks whether the ART made a legal error in the process of reaching its decision. This is a narrower question, but a successful judicial review application can result in the ART’s decision being quashed and the case returned to the ART (or the Department) for reconsideration — effectively giving you another chance.
Grounds for Judicial Review — What Legal Errors Qualify?
To successfully seek judicial review, you must identify one or more recognised legal errors in the ART’s decision. The most common grounds include:
- Jurisdictional error:The ART exceeded its jurisdiction, failed to exercise its jurisdiction, or misconstrued its jurisdiction under the Migration Act
- Procedural fairness denial:The ART failed to give you adequate notice of adverse information, failed to allow you to respond, or otherwise denied you procedural fairness
- Failure to consider relevant material:The ART failed to consider evidence or submissions that were before it, or ignored a relevant legal requirement
- Consideration of irrelevant material:The ART took into account matters it was not legally permitted to consider
- Illogical or irrational reasoning:The Tribunal’s reasoning was so unreasonable that no rational decision-maker could have reached that conclusion on the evidence
- Error of law on the face of the record:A clear legal error apparent in the written decision itself
- Failure to apply Ministerial Direction:The ART failed to apply a binding Ministerial Direction in the correct sequence or manner
| Feature | ART (Merits Review) | FCFCOA (Judicial Review) |
|---|---|---|
| Examines the facts | Yes — considers all evidence | No — does not re-examine facts |
| Can grant the visa | Yes — directly | No — remits to ART/Dept |
| Reviews for legal errors | No — merits only | Yes — primary purpose |
| New evidence accepted | Yes — encouraged | Generally no |
| Requires legal grounds | No — any reason to disagree | Yes — specific legal errors only |
| Cost | Moderate | Higher — complex litigation |
The FCFCOA Process — Key Stages
- Deadline — 35 days from ART decision:The application to the FCFCOA must be filed within 35 days of the ART’s decision. This deadline is very strictly enforced. We review the ART decision immediately upon receipt and advise on grounds and prospects within days.
- Filing the application:We file an Originating Application and an affidavit setting out the grounds of review in the Federal Circuit Court. Filing fees apply (~$3,680+). Service on the Minister for Immigration is required.
- Bridging Visa during Federal Court proceedings:In most cases, the BVA is preserved while a Federal Court application is on foot, allowing the applicant to remain in Australia. We confirm this at lodgement.
- Directions hearing:The court typically schedules an initial directions hearing to manage the proceeding — exchange of documents, timetable for submissions, and hearing date.
- Submissions:Both parties file detailed written submissions. The Minister’s legal team will defend the ART decision. Our lawyers prepare comprehensive submissions identifying the specific legal errors.
- Hearing:The matter is heard by a Federal Circuit Court judge. Hearings are typically 1–3 hours. Both parties’ lawyers make oral submissions. The judge typically reserves judgment.
- Outcome:If successful, the court quashes the ART decision and remits the case back to the ART (or the Department in some cases) for reconsideration by a different Member. This gives you a fresh merits review. If unsuccessful, appeal to the Full Federal Court is possible in certain circumstances.
Speak to a Lawyer Today
No-obligation consultation